Shooting Child With AK-47. Was watching documentary on Russian Spetsnaz at the Beslan Hostage Crisis in Russia - spetsnaz ak wikipedia
At some point a girl was seen by 5 in the ground about 2 feet from the window of the school, were selected where Chechen separatists. Everyone assumes that the child was dead, but suddenly began to move, now was, and then transferred Dazed & Confused. A Spetsnaz Radio asked his commander, a "shot one girl in the leg in order to keep it to save over the fire area, away from the separatists, his life to think long term. When the officers made a decision captain that too late had asked her magnificent return to the breakaway and was assembled in the school.
1. Is our military, have also wound hostages of their own security and survival? 2. In your opionion is a good way to do this? 3. What kind of damage as an AK-47 is a leg of 5 years? 4. "She died from blood loss? 5.What if you take the picture without the" OK "? He has never said what the C / S Decision!
Sunday, January 31, 2010
Spetsnaz Ak Wikipedia Shooting Child With AK-47. Was Watching Documentary On Russian Spetsnaz At The Beslan Hostage Crisis In Russia
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
17 comments:
I will try to have the answers to the best of my knowledge there hold.
1. No, our military would not allow the wounds of a hostage, no matter how many times you play in movies. The reasoning is as follows. You meet someone who would be better to have a stroke very well and knows exactly where he was shot. Trying to get a soft tissue "is up for" shot is very difficult or impossible. The bottom line is we are not that risk, and our commanders.
2. Not a good choice ... see above for reasoning.
3. I saw this as an AK-47 and an AK-74 (what the Spetsnaz used primarily for CQB), not a small appendage of the child. If you defeated the three major leg bones (femur, tibia / fibi), then it is surely carry the body would be. This will more than likely remove the femoral artery or popatial. Anyone could kill a small child very quickly from loss of blood.
4. More than likely, see above.
5. The Spetsnaz, I feel if you do not something they have not allowed by his commander was, something lost forever ... disappear as such. In our chain of command that we roasted and sent to prison.
Drop Em! Suicide bombings are effective childeren and women, because no one expected, but we can all believe everything, while they do it right to be subjected to brainwashing, but the will of the gods.
AK 7.62x54 (not SKS 7.62x39) and the return game, probably the leg could decimate, and the child can die of blood loss if the soldier thinks, he told me that the risk of fire
That's an order that he does not give or take. I expect my team was able to save otherwise. Would meet There is no place for 5 years with an AK no serious damage for life.
Cut the BS! A projectile hits M43 7.62 x39mm an adult, shoulder to shoulder, turn, tail more than twice as effective and to remove the lung from the chest. Cartridge 5.45mm AK-74 is as deadly as the M43 cartridge. There is no doubt that the coup's maiden name five years in the leg probably bled to death in just five minutes!
Unfortunately, it would be dead or dying horribly soon after
I pull my body on the line takes risks as expressed
All weapons are developed above mentioned weapons to fight against something KILL
Lordshaiths argument is a load of cobblers, do you think about the length of the tape will make a difference to the child.
Mate in each of his illness, will AK47 7.62x39, SKS is a semiautomatic version of the same caliber AK CIVI
I trained with SLR (FN FAL), which is a cartridge larger than the AK. Is 7.62x51
This is definitely a strange situation. But if it is to save his life, then I wound. However, an AK to 5 years in the legs at high risk, on a main road.
an AK-47, which would seriously affect seriously a 5-age. The rounds are slugs, the standard series of the U.S. military against. I do not believe that taking hostages is a good idea, always. If you took the photo without permission, you are sitting in jail.
If there is an AK (7.62 x 39) to be around him may have been fatal for a child - even if they increased.
The discussion with the shell is about the size of a finger Mans.
AK-47 weapons is also not true - there is a good chance that would have killed on the spot to what extent it was.
Hitting a child with a ball of this type of weapon to stop the final killing the child.
The scenario that I know where are the snipers 'allowed' to kill the hostages, "hostile" is that if the enemy has weapons of mass destruction. Also in this case it is a safe bet something to take those measures.
Here you can only pray that we never make a decision.
Decision of the CO was not disclosed, but the result of the child.
1. These calls are made from case to case. Sent by the commander on the scene.
2.Not a good idea for everyone.
3. Damage to the AK can be fatal. When you die, do not get medical help quickly.
4. The child is almost certainly the leg drop and bled in a few minutes.
5. In the army with us, you can not put to death for hiring in the fighting charge.
It's ridiculous.
Also a round from an AK-47 killing in the leg blood loss.
.
I think that rounds of 7.62 mm to break the leg of the girl's safe to AK. Much better than dying.
I do not shoot that person, child or adult, unless they are armed and dangerous. However, if Spetsnaz is entered, there is no way to remember exactly who's who, when they briefly about terrorists, etc. That would be arranged so that the girl's hands behind their backs and using their fists, stocks, mail, etc. to places her hands on her back, and if time permits, cover the eyes with a bandage. This is to ensure that it will do later, not something crazy (it is) in a high stress situation that would jeopardize the mission and at the same time to someone who is not armed (with great pain when the round hits the knee or bone, can cause bleeding, fractures / broken bones and cause of the large amount of pain. If the femoral artery will die if nothing is done.) The U.S. military will never shoot a unarmed person hostage or for other reasons, but no guarantee that the victim (s) can be killed in the shootout.
This only shows that the Russians are crazy. I mean, it dosnt matter where u, not fighting the real life and video games. There are so many veins and arteries, which are clear throughout the body, the chances of a strike, they are very high, no matter where you shoot them, and if it garrenteed almost killed. I mean, the Russians could use such tactics is stupid, but I know that the United States does not.
Listen. used regardless of the dose weapon was, and what if the weapon, an AK-47, that crime is less offensive, if only a short walk down by about 12 Gauge.
This weapon AK blah, blah, blah, bullsh * t has been fired by a weapon
It is quite bizarre.
I can not imagine (U.S. Special Warfare Operator and I know that 3) even believe that the boy is shot in the leg w/AK-47 or other deadly weapon to prevent the danger is to know a viable solution.What a U.S. American agents, who already works in danger, and remove the child or to regenerate reliably.
The damage caused by a gunshot wound, including leg, caused by an AK-47 is enormous.
I hope that I do not expect the Russians to get out of trouble.
Post a Comment